News Links

Poll

Should the new constitution empower the public to recall ineffective MPs?
Yes
No

Your Say

Since the proposed constitution draft was aired, one big huddle is the power share between president and the PM. surprisingly Nyanza and rift valley are behind powerful PM while central is behind powerful president. Coincidentally, both base their arguments current principles. Thats why every time t ...

Noah K. Korir, Kenya


Your Comments

The Standard Blog

Blog: By Kipkirui K'Telwa

» State fed, housed the Kibera homeless, it shouldn’t abandon Mau evictees
» If the government provides food, I shall queue
» Are bows and arrows weapons?
» Blame it on impunity, nothing else
» Semenya deserves dignity
» We should be proud of our tribes
» Look, they are out to forget Jesus
» When it comes to Mau, none gets it right
» Forget The Hague, fibre optic is coming
» Students should elect Vice Chancellors
» Who pays for this psychopath’s letter writing?
» Who pays for this psychopath’s letter writing?
» Do your own Budget instead of waiting for Uhuru
» Sh9b, only a typo away
» Sh9b, only a typo away
» Marende made the wisest ruling ever
» Karua script follows that of other African women
» Vice chancellors should embrace dialogue
» Vice chancellors should embrace dialogue
» Civil society killings a chilling warning
» A better way to run elections
» It’s not Raila but Kenyans under threat
» Why I agree with Lucy Kibaki
» Threats, hard stance hurting education
» Kenyans paying too much for no education
» Parents paying too much for too little education
» When dictators fear the people, it is time to quake
» I blame ‘free medical care’ for the death of my niece
» Kenyans must learn from US polls
» Perhaps they are aping the adults

 

Other Bloggers


Nobody can prepare you for America
By Chris Wamalwa
Delaware USA

 


To move or not to move, that is the question in Kibera
By Rose Nzioka
Standard Group Online Editor

 


Ours is an economy run on handouts
By Timothy Makokha
Sub-Editor, Standard Group

 


Government should improve infrastructure to attract teams to World Cup
Editor's Choice

 

State fed, housed the Kibera homeless, it shouldn’t abandon Mau evictees

Published on 21/11/2009

By Kipkirui K’telwa

What exactly did Forest and Wildlife Minister Noah Wekesa mean when he said the Mau evictees should go back to where they came from? Is he implying that the State is planning mass deportation of the people of Mau as the colonialist did to most communities during their rule?

Unless the Government has other secrets, I would want to believe that it is promoting balkanisation of the country. Otherwise, why would he ask people who have sired children and buried their kinsmen in the Nakuru and Molo parts of Mau forest to go back to their homes in Kericho, Bureti, Bomet and elsewhere?

Most of the people who have volunteered to vacate their homes still live by the roadside.

Relief agencies took long to provide much needed humanitarian support to the displaced persons. Whether these people return to their homes at night and go back to the roadsides in the morning cannot surprise anyone. It is normal practise for a dispossessed person to sneak back to their former home as a way of beating disorientation.

The people being accused of sneaking back to their homes at night are women and children, whom we cannot expect to live in the open air at night.

While at it, both the State and relief agencies owe the evictees an apology. If the Government is housing and feeding slum dwellers, then the same should be extended to Mau evictees. Otherwise, it would be applying double standards to ask people to move out of their homes but fail to compensate, feed and shelter them once they are out.

By the way, not everybody who lives in Mau is a farmer. There are traders and other professionals whose livelihoods would be interfered with once evictions are actualised. The State should compensate them, too.

Natures’ Wisdom, a community-based organisations based in South Rift, estimates that more than one million people eke out a living from the Mau. It reports also that excisions of land for tea farming by British settlers displaced thousands of people from their original land and pushed them into the Mau forest for alternative settlement. Successive governments have invoked eviction orders on the forest dwellers. Records indicate that evictions started immediately after gazettement of the Mau in 1932. The same exercise continued intermittently up to August, 1992.

The 1974 eviction disregarded sanctity of life, human dignity and protection of family. Security personnel, including GSU, confiscated and sold their livestock at between Sh10 and Sh20.

These brutalities did not deter the people from returning to the forest because they were not given alternative settlement. Therefore, the State should compensate the evictees.

It is the work of the Government to indiscriminately feed, shelter and protect its citizens.

COMMENTS

Post a Comment

Please note Name and a valid E-mail address are required.Your email will not be displayed on the site. Comments are fully moderated, and will not be published before they are reviewed. Posts that do not comply to www.eastandard.net Editorial Policy will not be published. Please note that submitting a comment is not the same as making a formal complaint.
Your Names*
Email Address*
Country*
Retype Verification Code*
 verification image, type it in the box

Comments*



(Maximum 400 Characters)
 

Sports News

ET: for SA
After two years of trudging the road to the Fifa World Cup finals in South Africa, the mosaic of 32 finalists is complete. ...more

Today's magazine

  Woman's Instinct
Forensic dentist and beauty queen

She struts the runway like she was born to do it and makes heads turn with her enchanting features, long mane and the fact that she is usually the only Asian on most catwalks in Nairobi. But 29-year-old Amrit Khalsi has another life: She traded the haute couture designer outfits for a lab coat and the runway for the Kenyatta National Hospital morgue.

Adverts